Virgin train crashes in England

Friday, February 23, 2007

This article features in a News Brief from Audio Wikinews:

A 9 Carriage Class 390 Pendolino train, with as many as 180 people onboard, operated by Virgin Trains has derailed and crashed in Cumbria, England.

The train was the 17:15 service from London’s Euston Station to Glasgow Central. Witnesses said that several passengers have broken bones. All but one carriage have slid down the embankment and all of the carriages were derailed. 5 people are still seriously injured in hospital, including the driver Ian Black, and 11 people altogether are still in hospital. Hospital reports early on Saturday morning indicate 1 death, 84 year old lady Margaret Masson from Glasgow.

“It’s our understanding there are a number of people injured on the train. We think there are numerous injuries,” said a spokesman for the Cumbria Fire and Rescue squad, Brian Mitchelhill.

“A train has crashed between Oxenholme and Tebay, but that is all we know at the moment. We have got two cars travelling there now and local police are attending,” said a spokeswoman for the British Transport Police.

At least twelve ambulances and at least five fire trucks are at the scene, along with 3 Royal Air Force Sea King helicopters, two mountain rescue teams and one police helicopter. The rescue effort was hampered by limited access to the remote site and poor weather conditions.

“At the moment, we have reports of various injuries, from leg injuries to back injuries and head injuries — ranging from minor to quite serious,” said an unnamed ambulance official.

“The carriage I am in is completely on its side, it did a sort of bump – and I was thinking don’t worry this fine – but then the swaying became very dramatic,” said a BBC executive, Caroline Thomson. “Where I am there are some injuries – a woman with a very badly hurt back but I suspect further up the train it’s a bit more serious.”

First reports suggested that the train hit something on the track at 20:15 near Grayrigg, between Oxenholme and Tebay, derailed and slid down an embankment. Early investigators reports say a set of points will be the primary focus of the investigation. All but one of the train’s carriages are said to have totally come off the tracks, a spokeswoman said.

So far 12 passengers have been taken to The Royal Preston Hospital, where three casualties are said to be in a “critical condition” and one serious. 3 passengers with limb injuries are at the Royal Lancaster Infirmary. People with minor injuries were taken to a nearby farm before being transferred to a Kendal hotel.

As of 22:16, Sleeper services over the affected line have been suspended. Other major services are terminating at Preston or Carlisle according to (UK) National Rail Enquires. A five mile cordon has been set up to seal the crash site as investigators from the Rail Accident Investigation Branch attempt to determine the cause of the crash.

Virgin owner Richard Branson came to the site from his holiday in Switzerland and held a press conference at a safe distance, roughly 200 meters, from the site. Branson stated that the Virgin Train Pendolino was “built like a tank”, and believed the track was to blame. All of the carriages retained their integrity and none of the windows broke. Mr Branson also praised the driver of the train for attempting to stop the train and not leaving the cockpit.

Network Rail has checked 700 sets of rail points in response to the accident, though no speed restrictions have been imposed.

British Transport Police Contact Number 0800 40 50 40

On the campaign trail in the USA, October 2016

Sunday, November 6, 2016

The following is the sixth and final edition of a monthly series chronicling the U.S. 2016 presidential election. It features original material compiled throughout the previous month after an overview of the month’s biggest stories.

In this month’s edition on the campaign trail: the Free & Equal Foundation holds a presidential debate with three little-known candidates; three additional candidates give their final pleas to voters; and past Wikinews interviewees provide their electoral predictions ahead of the November 8 election.

Drive Less To Enjoy Cheap Auto Insurance

Click Here To Find Out More About:

Submitted by: Hanery Jins

Shopping for cheap auto insurance can be trouble for anyone. We all have car insurance at some point in our lives. If you drive any type of vehicle, minimum liability coverage law in most states, no matter how young or old, need to buy.are. Cheap car insurance rates often can be achieved by driving less on a regular basis. Let’s explore “how and why” of the ordinary rate reducer.

What is your daily commute?

Within 10-15 miles of the work for you or you can just drive out of town 25-50 miles per day, drive? An insurance company if you mostly drive on country roads, interstate, or in heavy traffic within the city limits may want to know. And what are the reasons for this knowledge?

If you drive in heavy traffic or for long distances each day, you’re involved in an accident or a ticket for speeding or other traffic violations are likely to achieve.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enr2LRctqzQ[/youtube]

If you commute less than most people, there is less of a chance for accidents. Your insurance company may reward you with cheap auto insurance rates.will drive ways to get better rates.

Less risk, more profits

An insurance company’s point of view, the drivers, who rarely visit their automobiles on the highway and to bring benefit to low-risk posture. The ideal customer. After all, liability insurance is required in most states. Collision coverage is required by most banks, car loans while the borrower is still a balance. In the business world, car insurance, buy a product that is whether it ever can be or should not be used.Insurance companies consider these ideal clients that the company’s profits to keep flowing. If you are an “ideal customer” as likely to fall into this category you get cheap car insurance will be compared with the more frequent drivers.

There are also (pay as you drive) said something in place that you pay for insurance that PAYD policies in order to enable as you go.You basically based on the benefits as an essential will pay the premium.

As you consider where to buy auto coverage, to learn which to use to compare online auto cheap auto insurance options are available to make sure your needs.

Florida auto insurance is a type of SR -22. The auto insurance companies to use the minimum limit of liability insurance required for individuals to maintain the name of the form certifying compliance.

Florida car insurance minimum mandatory for most residents, as indicated in Florida No Fault Law, Personal Injury Protection and Property Damage liability $ 10,000 to $ 10,000. Bodily Injury Liability indicated on the SR-22, except for a mistake of law, a person who has to meet certain criteria. Drivers who have an accident, or accumulate too many points on their license, fail to provide evidence of the insurance may need an SR22. FR44 Florida Drivers with a DUI conviction is not an SR22 insurance is required.

Compliance with minimum bodily injury liability limits be at a Florida SR-22 $ 10,000 per person and per accident are $ 20,000. A joint liability in the amount of $ 30,000 a range of SR 22 – must meet the requirement. October 1, 2007 as an influence (DUI) guilty of operating a vehicle under the driver and a FR44 safe upper limit is not an SR22 filing to be submitted through the evidence.

Bodily injury liability insurance premiums to your insurance company requires an SR-22 filing is the same regardless. SR-22 insurance for the additional costs, in Florida, a $ 15.00 filing fee..

Restoration of your driver’s license or license plate required in an SR-22 as certified proof of liability insurance will occur after filing with the Bureau of Financial Responsibility. Reinstatement fee will apply in addition to the $ 15.00 filing fee. SR-22 and fr-44 (filed) are introduced by the insurance company. Electronic submissions are transmitted forms acceptable time and 15 days after the company begins a policy to file.

About the Author: This article on Auto Insurance Eagan was brought to you by

mnsfautoinsurance.com/SOUTHMETRO

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=884307&ca=Finances

Smoke from massive warehouse fire in Buffalo, New York USA can be seen 40 miles away

Monday, May 14, 2007

Buffalo, New York —A massive warehouse complex of at least 5 buildings caught on fire in Buffalo, New York on 111 Tonawanda Street, sending a plume of thick, jet black colored smoke into the air that could be seen as far away as 40 miles.

As of 6:40 a.m., the fire was under control, and firefighters were attempting to stop it from spreading, but could not get to the center of the fire because of severe amounts of debris. Later in the morning, the fire was extinguished.

“The fire is mostly under debris at this point. It’s under control, but it’s under some debris. We really can’t get to it. We’re just going to have to keep on pouring water on it so it doesn’t spread,” said Thomas Ashe, the fire chief for the North Buffalo based fire division who also added that at one point, at least 125 firefighters were on the scene battling the blaze. One suffered minor injures and was able to take himself to the hospital to seek medical attention.

Shortly after 8:00 p.m. as many as 3 explosions rocked the warehouse sending large mushroom clouds of thick black smoke into the air. After the third explosion, heat could be felt more than 100 feet away. The fire started in the front, one story building then quickly spread to three others, but fire fighters managed to stop the flames from spreading onto the 3 story building all the way at the back.

According to a Buffalo Police officer, who wished not to be named, the fire began at about 7:00 p.m. [Eastern time], starting as a one alarm fire. By 8:00 p.m., three fire companies were on the scene battling the blaze. Police also say that a smaller fire was reported in the same building on Saturday night, which caused little damage.

At the start of the fire, traffic was backed up nearly 4 miles on the 198 expressway going west toward the 190 Interstate and police had to shut down the Tonawanda street exit because the road is too close to the fire.

At one point, traffic on the 198 was moving so slow, at least a dozen people were seen getting out of their cars and walking down the expressway to watch the fire. That prompted as many as 10 police cars to be dispatched to the scene to force individuals back into their cars and close off one of the 2 lanes on the westbound side.

One woman, who wished not to be named as she is close to the owner of the warehouse, said the building is filled with “classic cars, forklifts, and money” and that owner “does not have insurance” coverage on the property. The building is not considered abandoned, but firefighters said that it is vacant.

Officials in Fort Erie, Ontario were also swamped with calls to fire departments when the wind blew the smoke over the Niagra River and into Canada.

It is not known what caused the fire, but a car is suspected to have caught on fire and there are reports from police and hazmat crews, that there were also large barrels of diesel fuel being stored in one building. Firefighters say the cause of the blaze is being treated as “suspicious.” The ATF is investigating the fire and will bring dogs in to search the debris.

U.S. Senate approves revised bailout package after controversial additions

Saturday, October 4, 2008

The U.S. Senate passed a revised bailout bill designed to help the struggling U.S. financial economy, which has measures nearly identical to the bill rejected by the U.S. House of Representatives on Monday.

“Senate Democrats and Republicans believe it is essential that we work quickly on this important legislation to restore confidence to our financial system and strengthen the economy,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

The new revisions include raising the FDIC insurance cap to $250,000, a move designed to please progressives. However, the $110 billion in tax breaks, earmarks and what has been called pork barrel spending is not offset by any increases in revenues and has added opposition to the bill from some Representatives in the House.

Earmarks added into the bailout bill included $192 million in tax rebates for the Virgin Islands rum industry, $148 million in tax cuts for the wool industry, $100 million tax cuts to the auto racing industry, and $48 million in Hollywood tax incentives.

Vice President of Taxpayers for Common Sense, Steve Ellis, offered his explanation for the pork and earmarks added in. “People who support some of these provisions will forget about the $700 billion and concerns they may have on that, and say, ‘If you give me a few million in tax breaks for my constituents, I’ll go along'”.

The tactic seems to have worked, however, managing to flip enough votes to pass the bill.

“The inclusion of parity, tax extenders and the FDIC increases has caused me to reconsider my position,” said Representative Jim Ramstad (R Minnesota), who voted against the previous bill on Monday. “All three additions have greatly improved the bill.”

But Representative Marcy Kaptur (D Ohio) was not changing her no vote. “I will not support this legislation because it’s the wrong medicine,” she said.

HAVE YOUR SAY
Do you think the bailout bill will help the US economy, hurt it, or be a waste of money?
Add or view comments

The Senate took H.R.1424, a bill originating in the House concerning “equity in the provision of mental health and substance-related disorder benefits under group health plans, to prohibit discrimination on the basis of genetic information with respect to health insurance and employment,” and extended it with the bailout provisions.

H.R.1424 was introduced on March 9, 2007, by Rep. Patrick Kennedy (RI-1) and had the support of First Lady Rosalind Carter. It is noted on the Congressional Website that “On 10/1/2008, the Senate passed H.R.1424 as the vehicle for the economic rescue legislation. In the EAS version of the bill (Engrossed Amendment as Agreed to by the Senate), Division A (pp.1-110) is referred to as the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008; Division B (pp. 110-255) is referred to as the Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008; and Division C (pp. 255-441) is referred to as the Tax Extenders and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008.” It was not treated as an appropriations bill in the House.

There were two votes in the Senate. The first was to amend H.R.1424, which required 3/5 to be accepted, which it was. The second was a vote on the bill. Passage of the Bill required only a 1/2 majority. It was passed with 74 yeas and 25 nays. Senator Kennedy did not vote.

What Are Pot Racks?

Click Here To Find Out More About:

By Yvonne Crooker

Recently, I told my daughter that I was buying her a pot rack for her new home. Incredulous, she looked at me and said, “A pot what, for goodness sake, and what would I do with it?” Actually, she is not the first person who has asked me to explain the meaning of the term. To understand what they are, you can read from many very good, and often lengthy, articles which have been written about home decorating. This article is designed to provide an easy to read introduction to a very useful and timeless kitchen accessory-the pot rack.

What is it? A pot rack is simply a piece of furniture that is commonly used to store pots and pans. The racks are usually placed in or near the kitchen and are often arranged so that the cooking pots and pans they store can be readily accessed from a stove or grill, and are often hung above a kitchen island. Most designs hang from the ceiling or are mounted to the wall. Some are even freestanding. The main purpose of a pot rack is to provide a convenient, efficient, and visually appealing way of storing pots and pans.

Historically, pot racks have been around for over 600 years. Wrought iron ceiling-hung racks were found in rustic Tuscan kitchens and pioneer cooks hung their skillets on one mounted on the wall behind the wood stove. This old fashioned kitchen accessory survived the centuries because of its versatility in all size kitchens and all decorating styles.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qst3vSHiLds[/youtube]

What are they made of? The most common types of materials used to make pot racks are wood, stainless steel, copper and wrought iron. Some other metals sometimes used are nickel and aluminum. Stainless steel and copper are very popular because they are shiny and compliment many types of metal cookware. Wood works well because it can be stained to match the kitchen woodwork. Wrought iron is popular due to its rustic charm and durability. It too, can be finished to match the dcor of any kitchen.

Why not just store my pots in a cabinet? Kitchen cookware can be made of fairly heavy materials like stainless steel, copper bottomed steel and cast iron. Pots and pans can be bulky and never seem to nest together properly. They are often quite awkward to get out of the cabinet quietly. If they are in a lower cabinet, they may be hiding in the dark making it hard for you to see which one you are reaching for. If they are in the upper cabinet, and it is over your head, you run the risk of doing physical damage to your body or countertop if you drop them.

Pot racks provide convenience over other storage alternatives. When a person is cooking, it is important to be able to find the right pot or pan quickly, and safely. With a pot rack, the correct pot or pan is usually within view and easily accessible from the stove or grill. And then there are those mysterious and elusive lids! The pot tops, lids and utensils can often be stored on the rack, too!

Besides convenience, pot racks can enhance the decor of your kitchen. With pots hanging from a rack, the kitchen looks more organized and functional. Moreover, there are many different types of pot racks that can be used to match almost any kitchen decorating scheme. These kitchen accessories can add rustic charm to a cabin, Tuscan style to Mediterranean dcor, shine and polish to a stainless steel modern kitchen, or color and curls to a country cottage.

Make a smart move. As you study your kitchen and think about redecorating, consider adding a pot rack. It will increase your storage space by taking the pots and pans out of the cabinets. It will help organize all of the cookware, lids and utensils in your kitchen. And, whether your kitchen is big or small, and whether you like classic or contemporary, a pot rack will add a ‘Wow’ factor to your decorating style!

About the Author: Yvonne Crooker is the author and can provide more information about pot racks and wrought iron kitchen accessories at

PotRackPlace.com

. Yvonne is a retired school administrator who has time now to devote to her creative talents, including decorating, quilting, and photography.

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=847294&ca=Home+Management

Charles Lazarus, founder of US-based toy retail giant Toys ‘R’ Us, dies at 94

Saturday, March 24, 2018

On Thursday, Charles Lazarus, the founder of United States toy retailer Toys “R” Us, died in Manhattan, New York, New York of respiratory failure. He was 94. His death came a week after Toys “R” Us announced that all of the stores were closing.

Toys “R” Us issued a statement in which they said, “There have been many sad moments for Toys “R” Us in recent weeks, and none more heartbreaking than today’s news about the passing of our beloved founder, Charles Lazarus. He visited us in New Jersey just last year and we will forever be grateful for his positive energy, passion for the customer and love for children everywhere. Our thoughts and prayers are with Charles’ family and loved ones.”

Michael Goldstein, who was a close friend and former Toys “R” Us chairman, said: “He was the father of the toy business. He knew the toys and loved the toys and loved the kids who would shop in the stores. His face lit up when he watched kids playing with toys.” In a phone interview Goldstein said that Charles Lazarus died in Manhattan.

Lazarus no longer held a stake in the chain, CNN reported. Lazarus took over his father’s bicycle repair shop in 1948 at the age of 25 and changed it to baby furniture. He opened the first Toys “R” Us store in 1957. Lazarus had remained its CEO until 1994.

U.S. improving Persian Gulf missile defense

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

The United States has begun improving the missile defense system for their Persian Gulf alliances. Military officials stated that the Obama administration is increasing the capability of land and sea missile defense in hopes of further security in the face of Iran’s perceived increasing nuclear missile threat.

General David Petraeus of U.S. Central Command made a statement saying eight new missile batteries have been placed in four separate countries in the Persian Gulf, now speculated to be Bahrain, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, and Qatar along with new Navy ships in the Mediterranean. The White House plans to send a review of the changes towards the missile defense strategy to the Congress on Monday, Feb. 1, 2010.

The expansion had begun under the Bush administration, now continuing with the Obama administration who wishes to take extra precautions against Iran’s growing Nuclear Program. Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, stated in December that the Pentagon is taking these protective measures in case the Obama administration later issues orders for defense against Iran.

U.S. President Barack Obama had also released a statement in 2009 saying that he wanted a strategic plan in which Aegis ships would be able to defend Persian Gulf allies in Europe from any threats.

The Obama administration said that these changes in land and sea defense are capable of defending the U.S. and it’s Persian Gulf allies from mid-range nuclear threats from Iran. The Pentagon also stated that ships containing SM-3 interceptors would enable the U.S. to re-locate the capabilities of the new missiles as needed, and that Aegis interceptor systems are capable of tracking upwards of 100 targets, and the the system can blow up missiles above the atmosphere.

The U.S. arms sales had surpassed the sales from Saudi Arabia by approximately $4.6 billion in 2009.

Nz Rent To Own Christchurch

Click Here To Find Out More About:

nz rent to own christchurch

by

rubyengagementring

Rent To Own Christchurch

Christchurch is really a very good location to live and play, via our rent to own Christchurch process we can help you into getting your own home.

Christchurch stands out as the second largest city in New Zealand and by taking advantage of a rent to own in Christchurch it is possible to quite enjoy the perfect lifestyle.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9sTPJX9U-w[/youtube]

You are by no means far in the art gallery, cathedral square and not to mention the entertainment areas along the Avon river and via Lichfield streets.

We give you the alternative of choosing your own home, that is certainly right, we pre approve you with our trusted mortgage broker and send you out home hunting with a given cost cap, whenever you have discovered a residence that suits your requirements then we move in to negotiate probably the most deal possible for you, we adore generating this and take in pride in heading the additional mile to obtain the best price for you personally and your family.

Depending on which suburb you desire your rent to rent to own in Christchurch to be in, it is possible to prefer as a small closer on the beaches and mountains like some of our rent to own Christchurch clients have already taken advantage of.

For some of our additional outgoing rent to own Christchurch clients we can extremely recommend the vibrant nightlife and a few of the best restaurants and cafes in new zealand, we now have some of the most reputable fashion designers within the central city, most located in heritage architecture which give a true character aspect to not merely certain suburbs but also the entire city of Christchurch.

By taking advantage in the benefits of the rent to own in Christchurch it is possible to extremely appreciate the most of New Zealand.

Christchurch is also known by it s Maori name; ?tautahi.

We look forward to helping you reach your goal of owning your own home in Christchurch through our rent to own system.

Rent to own Christchurch

Isn’t it amazing you can buy a house even when you thought you couldn’t…..HERE’S PROOF!!!

rent to own christchurch

Article Source:

ArticleRich.com

Others named in lawsuit against Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal

Buffalo, N.Y. Hotel Proposal Controversy
Recent Developments
  • “120 year-old documents threaten development on site of Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal” — Wikinews, November 21, 2006
  • “Proposal for Buffalo, N.Y. hotel reportedly dead: parcels for sale “by owner”” — Wikinews, November 16, 2006
  • “Contract to buy properties on site of Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal extended” — Wikinews, October 2, 2006
  • “Court date “as needed” for lawsuit against Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal” — Wikinews, August 14, 2006
  • “Preliminary hearing for lawsuit against Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal rescheduled” — Wikinews, July 26, 2006
  • “Elmwood Village Hotel proposal in Buffalo, N.Y. withdrawn” — Wikinews, July 13, 2006
  • “Preliminary hearing against Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal delayed” — Wikinews, June 2, 2006
Original Story
  • “Hotel development proposal could displace Buffalo, NY business owners” — Wikinews, February 17, 2006

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Buffalo, New York —A copy has been obtained of the lawsuit filed against the City of Buffalo for allegedly fast-tracking a seven million dollar hotel proposal.

The Elmwood Village Hotel is a 72-room, seven-million-dollar hotel proposed by Savarino Construction Services Corporation and designed by architect Karl Frizlen of the Frizlen Group. Its construction would require the demolition of at least five buildings, currently at 1109-1121 Elmwood, which house several shops and residents. Although the properties are “under contract,” it is still not known whether Savarino Construction actually owns the buildings. It is believed that Hans Mobius, a resident of Clarence, New York and former Buffalo mayoral candidate, is still the owner. The hotel is expected to be a franchise of the Wyndham Hotels group.

According to official court documents, there are more defendants than previously thought. Documents state that not only Buffalo’s Common Council and Planning Board are named in the lawsuit, but also the Mayor of Buffalo, Byron W. Brown, Savarino Construction Services Corporation, Hans J. Mobius and his son Hans S. Mobius owners of the properties at stake, Pano Georgiadis, owner of Pano’s Restaurant on Elmwood, and Cendant Corporation, the parent company of Wyndham Hotels are also named in the suit.

According to the lawsuit, during the length of the trial, Savarino Construction along with their employees, Hans Mobius and his son are not allowed to make any alterations or “engage in the physical alteration” of any of the said properties, 1109-1121 Elmwood and 9999 Forest. The suit also states that the owner of 605 Forest, Pano Georgiadis is also to follow the same rule.

The suit also states that Hans Mobius, his son and employees or “agents” are not allowed to “take any step, lawful or otherwise, to terminate [the] petitioners, Nancy Pollina and Patricia Morris,” owners of Don Apparel at 1119 Elmwood “tenancies.” Although the business is owned by Pollina and Morris, they are without a lease.

Within the suit it states that the rezoning of the properties 1119-1121 Elmwood and 605 Forest, by the Common Council, from a ‘R3’ Dwelling District to a C2 commercial zone “constitutes as impermissible ‘spot-zoning'” and is “not in accord with a well-considered plan for the development of the community and is null and void.” According to the suit the courts of New York have defined spot-zoning as “the process of singling out a small parcel of land for a use classification totally different from that of the surrounding area, for the benefit of the owner of such properties and to the detriment of other owners.” The suit also states that the proposed site for the hotel is different from the surrounding properties because none of the zoning classifications, ‘EB’ [Elmwood Avenue Business District], ‘R3’ [Dwelling District], ‘R1’ [One Family District] and ‘R2’ [Dwelling District], permit the construction and operation of a hotel.

It is alleged that Savarino Construction “failed to utilize forms obtainable from the city clerks office, failed to include an accurate map or survey showing the location of all buildings and structures and failed to include the names and addresses of each of the owners of the properties to be rezoned.”

It is also believed that recommendation in regards to [hotel] compatibility, different land uses, traffic studies, community character, population density, relations between other residents and business owners, public convenience, governmental efficiency, and achieving and maintaining a satisfied community, were to be sent to Erie County’s Planning agency and was to refer Savarino’s rezoning application and site plan to the agency, however; the lawsuit alleges that although a referral was given to Savarino, it “does not appear that the ‘full statement of such proposed action’ was forwarded to the County [Agency].”

The suit also alleges that the Common Council “failed to wait the ‘statutorily-mandated’ 30-days after the County’s Planning Agency’s receipt” of recommendations from the Council. The County’s Planning Agency replied to the recommendations, however; the Agency replied on March 27, 2006, just six days after the Council made its recommendations, falling well short of the “statutorily-mandated” thirty days. The Agency’s reply however, did not support or oppose the recommendations or hotel proposal.

Public hearings are required to be registered by the City clerk to the City Planning Board, and according to the suit, “no record” of the Public hearing on March 7, presenting the initial proposal to the public, was made within the City’s Clerk office or Planning Board.

The suit also alleges that the Common council and Planning Board also violated the State’s Environmental Quality Review Act or SEQRA and the City’s Environmental Review Ordinance by allowing the Planning Board to be the “lead agency” instead of the Common Council. A lead agency is an involved agency principally responsible for undertaking or approving an action and therefore responsible for determining whether an Environmental Impact Statement or EIS is needed, according to the SEQRA regulations. The suit also states that the hotel proposal “constitutes an action under the SEQRA” because the project could “affect the environment by changing the use, appearance or condition of any natural resource or structure that requires one or more approvals from an agency or agencies” and that the Common Council and Planning Board are “obliged to comply with both the letter [recommendations] and spirit of the SEQRA review process” which include identifying the areas of environmental concerns and taking a “hard look” at them. The suit also claims that the Common Council has the “sole authority to grant Savarino Construction’s rezoning request” and “to approve the special development plan,” but it also claims that the Planning Board is “an involved agency” but that it is “clearly subordinate to that of the Common Council” therefore the decision made by both the Council and Planning Board to allow the Planning Board to be the ‘lead agency,’ is in “violation” of the State’s SEQRA and “renders all determinations” made by the Planning Board and Common Council on March 14, 21, and 28, 2006, “void and unauthorized.” It goes on to say that the Council “proceeded without or in excess of their jurisdiction, and/or made a determination in violation of lawful procedure, affected by an error of law, and/or in an arbitrary and capricious manner.” It also states that unless the requirements of the SEQRA are met, then the petitioners have the right to “seek a temporary restraining order” from the Court if circumstances require it.

The suit also states that a failure to grant a preliminary injunction, through the courts, will result in “irreparable injury” to the petitioners and that the Council and Planing Board have failed to comply with the requirements of the SEQRA and have violated several other state laws and city codes.

So far, Savarino Construction has not responded to any calls or e-mails. District councilman Joseph Golombek also has not responded. Georgiadias was unavailable for comment.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled to take place at 9:30 a.m. on June 8, 2006 in the Supreme Court building at 50 Delaware Avenue in Buffalo, on the 8th floor, part 31.